This specification is maintained by the AgentRules Working Group. Have enhancements or want to claim maintainership?Submit Specification →
frontendcritical PriorityID: svelte-5-async-derived-dependency-isolation-invariant

Svelte 5 Runes Async Derived Dependency Isolation Invariant

Svelte 5's $derived rune must strictly remain synchronous and free of untracked post-await dependency reads to prevent asynchronous dependency leakage and cascading reactive loops. Asynchronous state derivation must explicitly isolate its trigger dependencies, encapsulate pending promises through un-tracked invocations or dedicated resource state holders, and prevent unawaited Promise resolutions from executing downstream effect loops.

Prohibited Anti-Pattern: Leaking Reactive Dependencies Across Asynchronous Execution Boundaries in Derived Runes

Export Ready-to-Drop Configuration

Select format below to copy code or download file directly.

---
description: Svelte 5 Runes Async Derived Dependency Isolation Invariant - Svelte 5's $derived rune must strictly remain synchronous and free of untracked post-await dependency reads to prevent asynchronous dependency leakage and cascading reactive loops. Asynchronous state derivation must explicitly isolate its trigger dependencies, encapsulate pending promises through un-tracked invocations or dedicated resource state holders, and prevent unawaited Promise resolutions from executing downstream effect loops.
globs: src/**/*.{svelte,svelte.ts,svelte.js,ts,js}
alwaysApply: true
verified_by: "agentrules.org"
license: "CC-BY-4.0"
source: "https://agentrules.org/rules/svelte-5-async-derived-dependency-isolation-invariant"
---

# Svelte 5 Runes Async Derived Dependency Isolation Invariant

> **Severity**: CRITICAL | **Category**: frontend
> **Anti-Pattern Warning**: Leaking Reactive Dependencies Across Asynchronous Execution Boundaries in Derived Runes

## System Constraints
You are a Principal Engineer enforcing the Svelte 5 Runes Async Derived Dependency Isolation Invariant. Svelte 5 introduces fine-grained reactive runes ($state, $derived, $effect) driven by synchronous dependency tracking. Asynchronous derived state creates severe architectural flaws when async/await sequences inadvertently expand the reactive tracking scope or trigger race conditions through unsequenced microtask resolutions. You must mandate strict isolation between reactive tracking phases and asynchronous side effects, ensuring $derived is kept purely synchronous and async resolution boundaries are encapsulated cleanly with cancellation or sequence identification.

## Strict Guidelines
- Engineers MUST ALWAYS keep $derived and $derived.by expressions completely synchronous, using explicit reactive triggers instead of unawaited Promise payloads inside derived scopes.
- Engineers MUST NOT read mutable reactive signals ($state) after an 'await' boundary within an asynchronous context triggered by reactivity, as this can orphan dependency tracking or cause stale closure captures.
- Engineers MUST encapsulate asynchronous derivation logic into dedicated classes or composable functions using explicit tracking primitives (e.g., untrack) combined with $state storage for resolution values, pending flags, and error states.
- Components NEVER use inline asynchronous IIFEs inside $derived.by to fetch or resolve data; engineers must model asynchronous transitions via Svelte 5 resource patterns, deterministic sequence counters, or abortable async loaders.
- Engineers MUST pass explicit, synchronously-read snapshot arguments into asynchronous worker functions rather than referencing ambient $state across asynchronous ticks.

## Bad vs Good Implementations
### Async Data Resolution: Inline Async Derived vs Isolated Encapsulated Resource

#### Bad Antipattern (AI Common Hallucination)
> **Why it fails**: In Svelte 5, $derived.by expectations are synchronous. Returning a Promise creates an unhandled promise pipeline where reads after the first 'await' occur outside the synchronous tracking phase. Rapid changes to 'query' trigger concurrent fetches with zero cancellation, resulting in out-of-order resolution bugs.
```typescript
import { state, derived } from 'svelte';

// ANTI-PATTERN: Async IIFE in $derived.by leads to uncollected dependencies,
// post-await reads leaking reactivity, and non-deterministic race conditions.
let query = $state('');
let filter = $state('active');

const searchResults = $derived.by(async () => {
  if (!query) return [];
  // First tick tracked query synchronously
  const res = await fetch(`/api/search?q=${query}`);
  // Post-await read of 'filter' is NOT reliably tracked or can trigger
  // unexpected cascading execution if accessed concurrently
  const json = await res.json();
  return json.filter((item: any) => item.status === filter);
});
```

#### Production Standard (Correct)
> **Standard**: This pattern guarantees dependency isolation. $effect synchronously tracks query and filter changes. Untrack prevents mutation of state variables from generating self-loops. Sequence counter and AbortController ensure that stale async ticks cannot overwrite newer state.
```typescript
import { untrack } from 'svelte';

// PRODUCTION FIX: Purely synchronous parameter extraction paired with
// deterministic sequence tracking and isolated async fetching.
class AsyncResource<TParam, TResult> {
  value = $state<TResult | null>(null);
  isLoading = $state(false);
  error = $state<Error | null>(null);
  private sequence = 0;

  constructor(
    private paramsFn: () => TParam,
    private loader: (params: TParam, signal: AbortSignal) => Promise<TResult>
  ) {
    let controller: AbortController | null = null;

    $effect(() => {
      // Synchronously track only declared parameters
      const params = this.paramsFn();
      const currentSeq = ++this.sequence;

      if (controller) controller.abort();
      controller = new AbortController();
      const signal = controller.signal;

      untrack(() => {
        this.isLoading = true;
        this.error = null;
      });

      this.loader(params, signal)
        .then((data) => {
          if (currentSeq === this.sequence) {
            this.value = data;
            this.isLoading = false;
          }
        })
        .catch((err) => {
          if (currentSeq === this.sequence && err.name !== 'AbortError') {
            this.error = err instanceof Error ? err : new Error(String(err));
            this.isLoading = false;
          }
        });

      return () => controller?.abort();
    });
  }
}

let query = $state('');
let filter = $state('active');

const searchResource = new AsyncResource(
  () => ({ query, filter }),
  async ({ query, filter }, signal) => {
    if (!query) return [];
    const res = await fetch(`/api/search?q=${encodeURIComponent(query)}`, { signal });
    const json = await res.json();
    return json.filter((item: { status: string }) => item.status === filter);
  }
);
```

Recommended MCP Servers (mcp-serverlist.com)

Equip agent with system tools to verify code for this stack.

Recommended Agent Skills (askills.dev)

Ready-to-use executable skill functions tailored to this stack.

Architectural Specification & Invariant Rationale

Architectural Invariant Design: Svelte 5 Runes Async Derived Dependency Isolation Invariant

Svelte 5 Runes Async Derived Dependency Isolation Invariant defines an industrial-grade behavioral standard for frontend engineering. Svelte 5's $derived rune must strictly remain synchronous and free of untracked post-await dependency reads to prevent asynchronous dependency leakage and cascading reactive loops. Asynchronous state derivation must explicitly isolate its trigger dependencies, encapsulate pending promises through un-tracked invocations or dedicated resource state holders, and prevent unawaited Promise resolutions from executing downstream effect loops. Modern software architectures require strict adherence to deterministic patterns to guarantee high availability, maintainability, and zero security vulnerabilities.

Framework Paradigm Shift & Drift MechanicsLLMs are trained on millions of open-source repositories containing outdated code, legacy idioms, and unpatched antipatterns. When coding assistants generate implementations for this stack, they default to common statistical tokens: Leaking Reactive Dependencies Across Asynchronous Execution Boundaries in Derived Runes Without an explicit system instruction file, developers spend hours debugging silent failures.
Failure Modes & Production Blast Radius

Hazard Analysis: What Breaks Without This Rule

The following failure modes have been cataloged from hundreds of hours of production code reviews where AI assistants produced non-compliant implementations:

Failure ModeAI Symptom (The Anti-Pattern)SeverityProduction Impact & Remedy
AI Hallucination & Deprecation DriftLeaking Reactive Dependencies Across Asynchronous Execution Boundaries in Derived RunesCritical
Violating this industrial standard introduces regression bugs, security risks, and unexpected runtime failures in production.
Enforce explicit behavioral system directives across all AI coding assistants in your repository.
Silent Architecture InconsistencyAI assistants produce mixed paradigms across files, creating fragmented codebase conventions.Medium
Increases cognitive load during code reviews and leads to maintenance debt across engineering teams.
Pin project conventions in .cursor/rules, CLAUDE.md, and AGENTS.md so all team agents follow identical guardrails.
Architectural Directives in Detail

Step-by-Step Production Directives

Each rule constraint below is injected into the AI agent's system prompt to establish deterministic boundaries:

1

Engineers MUST ALWAYS keep $derived and $derived.by expressions completely synchronous, using explicit reactive triggers instead of unawaited Promise payloads inside derived scopes.

Engineers MUST ALWAYS keep $derived and $derived.by expressions completely synchronous, using explicit reactive triggers instead of unawaited Promise payloads inside derived scopes.

Rationale:AI models frequently generate unconstrained code here because statistical language distributions lack project-specific architectural context. Mandating this directive ensures that generated code adheres to verified industrial production requirements.
Enforcement:Integrated into the Agent Pack rule file. When Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex processes this prompt, it applies this constraint before emitting syntax.
2

Engineers MUST NOT read mutable reactive signals ($state) after an 'await' boundary within an asynchronous context triggered by reactivity, as this can orphan dependency tracking or cause stale closure captures.

Engineers MUST NOT read mutable reactive signals ($state) after an 'await' boundary within an asynchronous context triggered by reactivity, as this can orphan dependency tracking or cause stale closure captures.

Rationale:AI models frequently generate unconstrained code here because statistical language distributions lack project-specific architectural context. Mandating this directive ensures that generated code adheres to verified industrial production requirements.
Enforcement:Integrated into the Agent Pack rule file. When Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex processes this prompt, it applies this constraint before emitting syntax.
3

Engineers MUST encapsulate asynchronous derivation logic into dedicated classes or composable functions using explicit tracking primitives (e.g., untrack) combined with $state storage for resolution values, pending flags, and error states.

Engineers MUST encapsulate asynchronous derivation logic into dedicated classes or composable functions using explicit tracking primitives (e.g., untrack) combined with $state storage for resolution values, pending flags, and error states.

Rationale:AI models frequently generate unconstrained code here because statistical language distributions lack project-specific architectural context. Mandating this directive ensures that generated code adheres to verified industrial production requirements.
Enforcement:Integrated into the Agent Pack rule file. When Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex processes this prompt, it applies this constraint before emitting syntax.
4

Components NEVER use inline asynchronous IIFEs inside $derived.by to fetch or resolve data

Components NEVER use inline asynchronous IIFEs inside $derived.by to fetch or resolve data; engineers must model asynchronous transitions via Svelte 5 resource patterns, deterministic sequence counters, or abortable async loaders.

Rationale:AI models frequently generate unconstrained code here because statistical language distributions lack project-specific architectural context. Mandating this directive ensures that generated code adheres to verified industrial production requirements.
Enforcement:Integrated into the Agent Pack rule file. When Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex processes this prompt, it applies this constraint before emitting syntax.
5

Engineers MUST pass explicit, synchronously-read snapshot arguments into asynchronous worker functions rather than referencing ambient $state across asynchronous ticks.

Engineers MUST pass explicit, synchronously-read snapshot arguments into asynchronous worker functions rather than referencing ambient $state across asynchronous ticks.

Rationale:AI models frequently generate unconstrained code here because statistical language distributions lack project-specific architectural context. Mandating this directive ensures that generated code adheres to verified industrial production requirements.
Enforcement:Integrated into the Agent Pack rule file. When Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex processes this prompt, it applies this constraint before emitting syntax.
Technical Questions & Answers

Frequently Asked Technical Questions

Common questions developers face when configuring AI coding assistants for this stack:

Q:Why is Svelte 5 Runes Async Derived Dependency Isolation Invariant critical for AI coding assistants?

Svelte 5's $derived rune must strictly remain synchronous and free of untracked post-await dependency reads to prevent asynchronous dependency leakage and cascading reactive loops. Asynchronous state derivation must explicitly isolate its trigger dependencies, encapsulate pending promises through un-tracked invocations or dedicated resource state holders, and prevent unawaited Promise resolutions from executing downstream effect loops. Without explicit behavioral boundaries, AI coding assistants (Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf, Codex) rely on training data averages, which frequently produce deprecated, inefficient, or vulnerable code patterns.

Q:How does adopting this rule prevent AI hallucinations?

This rule explicitly declares what the AI must avoid (Leaking Reactive Dependencies Across Asynchronous Execution Boundaries in Derived Runes) and prescribes verified positive examples. Grounding the LLM with negative and positive pairs eliminates guesswork.

Q:Which AI coding environments are supported?

This specification is multi-platform compatible: Cursor (.cursor/rules/*.mdc & .cursorrules), Anthropic Claude Code (CLAUDE.md), Windsurf (.windsurfrules), Codex / Cline (AGENTS.md), and GitHub Copilot (.github/copilot-instructions.md).

Q:Can I combine this rule with other technology stacks?

Yes. Use the Interactive Stack Builder or download an Agent Pack to merge this rule with other frontend, backend, database, security, and DevOps rules without syntax collision.

Open Specification · CC BY 4.0·Free for Personal, Team & Commercial In-Repo Use

Citation & Open Source Attribution Guidelines

This specification is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You are completely free to adapt and share this rule in your workspace. If citing, including in public AI benchmark datasets, or redistributing, attribution to AgentRules.org is required.

Related FRONTEND Rules

View all rules →
frontend
119

SolidStart 1.0 Server Functions & Async Boundaries Production Standard

SolidStart 1.0 relies on the Vinxi bundler to split `server$` closures into independent HTTP POST RPC endpoints. Direct lexical closure over client signals within `server$` scopes or failure to demarcate async boundaries with `<Suspense>` causes silent serialization failures, client-bundle secret leaks, and SSR hydration mismatches. Enforcing strict parameter passing, runtime input validation, and Solid async primitives maintains security and fine-grained reactivity across network boundaries.

frontend
119

Astro 5 Actions & Content Layer Production Standard

Enforces strict type safety and architectural correctness for Astro 5 Server Actions and the zero-waterfall Content Layer API. Prevents runtime contract mismatches, hydration mismatches, and unhandled mutation exceptions across dynamic and prerendered boundaries. Failure to follow these patterns leads to silent data fetching waterfalls, build-time cache corruptions, and unhandled server action exceptions.

frontend
51

Nuxt 4 Nitro Server Engine & Shared Directory Production Standard

Nuxt 4 enforces strict boundary segregation between client UI in the app/ directory, backend endpoints in server/, and universal contracts in shared/. Violating cross-boundary isolation or maintaining module-scoped state in Nitro server handlers causes catastrophic cross-request data corruption and hydration mismatches under concurrent production traffic. Architects must enforce request-isolated H3 event contexts, universal serialization schemas, and strict path-alias boundaries.

1 Rule in Stack

Svelte