This specification is maintained by the AgentRules Working Group. Have enhancements or want to claim maintainership?Submit Specification →
securitycritical PriorityID: openfga-zanzibar-consistency-token-propagation

OpenFGA Zanzibar Consistency Token Propagation Standard

Enforces deterministic read-after-write consistency in distributed OpenFGA zero-trust authorization checks. Prevents authorization bypass and stale denial anomalies by capturing write continuation/checkpoint tokens and propagating them across distributed microservice RPC boundaries to guarantee evaluation against post-mutation authorization snapshots.

Prohibited Anti-Pattern: Stale Snapshot Authorization via Unpropagated Zanzibar Write Checkpoint Tokens

Export Ready-to-Drop Configuration

Select format below to copy code or download file directly.

---
description: OpenFGA Zanzibar Consistency Token Propagation Standard - Enforces deterministic read-after-write consistency in distributed OpenFGA zero-trust authorization checks. Prevents authorization bypass and stale denial anomalies by capturing write continuation/checkpoint tokens and propagating them across distributed microservice RPC boundaries to guarantee evaluation against post-mutation authorization snapshots.
globs: src/**/*.ts, src/**/*.tsx, src/auth/**/*.ts, src/services/**/*.ts, src/middleware/**/*.ts
alwaysApply: true
verified_by: "agentrules.org"
license: "CC-BY-4.0"
source: "https://agentrules.org/rules/openfga-zanzibar-consistency-token-propagation"
---

# OpenFGA Zanzibar Consistency Token Propagation Standard

> **Severity**: CRITICAL | **Category**: security
> **Anti-Pattern Warning**: Stale Snapshot Authorization via Unpropagated Zanzibar Write Checkpoint Tokens

## System Constraints
You are a Principal Security Architect enforcing Zanzibar consistency guarantees in OpenFGA integrations. You must ensure that every relationship tuple mutation captures and returns the consistency checkpoint token, and every subsequent authorization check originating from that context mandates snapshot freshness using `consistency: { at_least_as_fresh_as: token }`. You reject any check evaluation relying on default eventual consistency when downstream of a write.

## Strict Guidelines
- Engineers MUST ALWAYS capture the consistency/continuation token returned from `openFgaClient.write()` or `writeTuples()` responses.
- Services MUST propagate the captured token in response headers (`x-fga-consistency-token`) or distributed tracing context metadata across RPC boundaries.
- Engineers MUST NOT execute `openFgaClient.check()` with default `MINIMIZE_LATENCY` consistency when evaluating authorization immediately following a write mutation within the same user workflow.
- Code SHOULD enforce `ConsistencyPreference.AtLeastAsFreshAs` parameterizing the evaluation with the explicit incoming consistency token from request headers or message envelopes.
- Components NEVER drop consistency tokens when publishing domain events that trigger secondary asynchronous permission evaluations.

## Bad vs Good Implementations
### Write-Check Flow Missing Zanzibar Consistency Token Propagation

#### Bad Antipattern (AI Common Hallucination)
> **Why it fails**: The check call defaults to eventual consistency (MINIMIZE_LATENCY). OpenFGA distributed replicas may not have synchronized the newly written tuple, resulting in a false-negative authorization denial or stale policy evaluation immediately following the grant.
```typescript
import { OpenFgaClient } from '@openfga/sdk';

export async function grantAccessAndVerify(
  fga: OpenFgaClient,
  userId: string,
  documentId: string
): Promise<boolean> {
  // Anti-pattern: Writes tuple and discards write metadata/token
  await fga.write({
    writes: [{ user: `user:${userId}`, relation: 'viewer', object: `doc:${documentId}` }]
  });

  // Stale replica read: Read-after-write race condition causes false negative
  const { allowed } = await fga.check({
    user: `user:${userId}`,
    relation: 'viewer',
    object: `doc:${documentId}`
  });

  return allowed ?? false;
}
```

#### Production Standard (Correct)
> **Standard**: Captures the transactional continuation token from the write operation and supplies it to `fga.check` using `ConsistencyPreference.AtLeastAsFreshAs`. This guarantees OpenFGA evaluates authorization on a datastore snapshot at or after the write, eliminating read-after-write authorization anomalies.
```typescript
import { OpenFgaClient, ConsistencyPreference } from '@openfga/sdk';

export interface AuthorizationGrantResult {
  allowed: boolean;
  consistencyToken: string;
}

export async function grantAccessAndVerify(
  fga: OpenFgaClient,
  userId: string,
  documentId: string
): Promise<AuthorizationGrantResult> {
  // Invariant: Capture the write transaction checkpoint token
  const writeResponse = await fga.write({
    writes: [{ user: `user:${userId}`, relation: 'viewer', object: `doc:${documentId}` }]
  });

  const consistencyToken = writeResponse.continuation_token ?? '';

  // Invariant: Enforce read-after-write snapshot consistency via consistency token
  const { allowed } = await fga.check({
    user: `user:${userId}`,
    relation: 'viewer',
    object: `doc:${documentId}`,
    consistency: consistencyToken
      ? {
          preference: ConsistencyPreference.AtLeastAsFreshAs,
          token: consistencyToken
        }
      : {
          preference: ConsistencyPreference.HigherConsistency
        }
  });

  return {
    allowed: allowed ?? false,
    consistencyToken
  };
}
```

Recommended MCP Servers (mcp-serverlist.com)

Equip agent with system tools to verify code for this stack.

Recommended Agent Skills (askills.dev)

Ready-to-use executable skill functions tailored to this stack.

Architectural Specification & Invariant Rationale

Architectural Invariant Design: OpenFGA Zanzibar Consistency Token Propagation Standard

OpenFGA Zanzibar Consistency Token Propagation Standard defines an industrial-grade behavioral standard for security engineering. Enforces deterministic read-after-write consistency in distributed OpenFGA zero-trust authorization checks. Prevents authorization bypass and stale denial anomalies by capturing write continuation/checkpoint tokens and propagating them across distributed microservice RPC boundaries to guarantee evaluation against post-mutation authorization snapshots. Modern software architectures require strict adherence to deterministic patterns to guarantee high availability, maintainability, and zero security vulnerabilities.

Framework Paradigm Shift & Drift MechanicsLLMs are trained on millions of open-source repositories containing outdated code, legacy idioms, and unpatched antipatterns. When coding assistants generate implementations for this stack, they default to common statistical tokens: Stale Snapshot Authorization via Unpropagated Zanzibar Write Checkpoint Tokens Without an explicit system instruction file, developers spend hours debugging silent failures.
Failure Modes & Production Blast Radius

Hazard Analysis: What Breaks Without This Rule

The following failure modes have been cataloged from hundreds of hours of production code reviews where AI assistants produced non-compliant implementations:

Failure ModeAI Symptom (The Anti-Pattern)SeverityProduction Impact & Remedy
AI Hallucination & Deprecation DriftStale Snapshot Authorization via Unpropagated Zanzibar Write Checkpoint TokensCritical
Violating this industrial standard introduces regression bugs, security risks, and unexpected runtime failures in production.
Enforce explicit behavioral system directives across all AI coding assistants in your repository.
Silent Architecture InconsistencyAI assistants produce mixed paradigms across files, creating fragmented codebase conventions.Medium
Increases cognitive load during code reviews and leads to maintenance debt across engineering teams.
Pin project conventions in .cursor/rules, CLAUDE.md, and AGENTS.md so all team agents follow identical guardrails.
Architectural Directives in Detail

Step-by-Step Production Directives

Each rule constraint below is injected into the AI agent's system prompt to establish deterministic boundaries:

1

Engineers MUST ALWAYS capture the consistency/continuation token returned from `openFgaClient.write()` or `writeTuples()` responses.

Engineers MUST ALWAYS capture the consistency/continuation token returned from `openFgaClient.write()` or `writeTuples()` responses.

Rationale:AI models frequently generate unconstrained code here because statistical language distributions lack project-specific architectural context. Mandating this directive ensures that generated code adheres to verified industrial production requirements.
Enforcement:Integrated into the Agent Pack rule file. When Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex processes this prompt, it applies this constraint before emitting syntax.
2

Services MUST propagate the captured token in response headers (`x-fga-consistency-token`) or distributed tracing context metadata across RPC boundaries.

Services MUST propagate the captured token in response headers (`x-fga-consistency-token`) or distributed tracing context metadata across RPC boundaries.

Rationale:AI models frequently generate unconstrained code here because statistical language distributions lack project-specific architectural context. Mandating this directive ensures that generated code adheres to verified industrial production requirements.
Enforcement:Integrated into the Agent Pack rule file. When Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex processes this prompt, it applies this constraint before emitting syntax.
3

Engineers MUST NOT execute `openFgaClient.check()` with default `MINIMIZE_LATENCY` consistency when evaluating authorization immediately following a write mutation within the same user workflow.

Engineers MUST NOT execute `openFgaClient.check()` with default `MINIMIZE_LATENCY` consistency when evaluating authorization immediately following a write mutation within the same user workflow.

Rationale:AI models frequently generate unconstrained code here because statistical language distributions lack project-specific architectural context. Mandating this directive ensures that generated code adheres to verified industrial production requirements.
Enforcement:Integrated into the Agent Pack rule file. When Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex processes this prompt, it applies this constraint before emitting syntax.
4

Code SHOULD enforce `ConsistencyPreference.AtLeastAsFreshAs` parameterizing the evaluation with the explicit incoming consistency token from request headers or message envelopes.

Code SHOULD enforce `ConsistencyPreference.AtLeastAsFreshAs` parameterizing the evaluation with the explicit incoming consistency token from request headers or message envelopes.

Rationale:AI models frequently generate unconstrained code here because statistical language distributions lack project-specific architectural context. Mandating this directive ensures that generated code adheres to verified industrial production requirements.
Enforcement:Integrated into the Agent Pack rule file. When Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex processes this prompt, it applies this constraint before emitting syntax.
5

Components NEVER drop consistency tokens when publishing domain events that trigger secondary asynchronous permission evaluations.

Components NEVER drop consistency tokens when publishing domain events that trigger secondary asynchronous permission evaluations.

Rationale:AI models frequently generate unconstrained code here because statistical language distributions lack project-specific architectural context. Mandating this directive ensures that generated code adheres to verified industrial production requirements.
Enforcement:Integrated into the Agent Pack rule file. When Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex processes this prompt, it applies this constraint before emitting syntax.
Technical Questions & Answers

Frequently Asked Technical Questions

Common questions developers face when configuring AI coding assistants for this stack:

Q:Why is OpenFGA Zanzibar Consistency Token Propagation Standard critical for AI coding assistants?

Enforces deterministic read-after-write consistency in distributed OpenFGA zero-trust authorization checks. Prevents authorization bypass and stale denial anomalies by capturing write continuation/checkpoint tokens and propagating them across distributed microservice RPC boundaries to guarantee evaluation against post-mutation authorization snapshots. Without explicit behavioral boundaries, AI coding assistants (Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf, Codex) rely on training data averages, which frequently produce deprecated, inefficient, or vulnerable code patterns.

Q:How does adopting this rule prevent AI hallucinations?

This rule explicitly declares what the AI must avoid (Stale Snapshot Authorization via Unpropagated Zanzibar Write Checkpoint Tokens) and prescribes verified positive examples. Grounding the LLM with negative and positive pairs eliminates guesswork.

Q:Which AI coding environments are supported?

This specification is multi-platform compatible: Cursor (.cursor/rules/*.mdc & .cursorrules), Anthropic Claude Code (CLAUDE.md), Windsurf (.windsurfrules), Codex / Cline (AGENTS.md), and GitHub Copilot (.github/copilot-instructions.md).

Q:Can I combine this rule with other technology stacks?

Yes. Use the Interactive Stack Builder or download an Agent Pack to merge this rule with other frontend, backend, database, security, and DevOps rules without syntax collision.

Open Specification · CC BY 4.0·Free for Personal, Team & Commercial In-Repo Use

Citation & Open Source Attribution Guidelines

This specification is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You are completely free to adapt and share this rule in your workspace. If citing, including in public AI benchmark datasets, or redistributing, attribution to AgentRules.org is required.

1 Rule in Stack

OpenFGA