This specification is maintained by the AgentRules Working Group. Have enhancements or want to claim maintainership?Submit Specification →
backendcritical PriorityID: openfga-rebac-causal-consistency-invariant

OpenFGA ReBAC Causal Consistency & Bounded-Staleness Guardrail

Eliminates authorization race conditions in high-throughput microservices by enforcing causal consistency token propagation and strict bounded-staleness cache validation. Prevents unauthorized resource exposure caused by evaluating permission checks against stale relationship tuples immediately following state mutations (read-after-write anomalies). Mandates contextual consistency tokens or forced upstream read evaluation during high-integrity authorization transactions.

Prohibited Anti-Pattern: Blind ReBAC Checks Vulnerable to Read-After-Write Consistency Race Conditions

Export Ready-to-Drop Configuration

Select format below to copy code or download file directly.

---
description: OpenFGA ReBAC Causal Consistency & Bounded-Staleness Guardrail - Eliminates authorization race conditions in high-throughput microservices by enforcing causal consistency token propagation and strict bounded-staleness cache validation. Prevents unauthorized resource exposure caused by evaluating permission checks against stale relationship tuples immediately following state mutations (read-after-write anomalies). Mandates contextual consistency tokens or forced upstream read evaluation during high-integrity authorization transactions.
globs: src/services/auth*/**/*.{ts,js}, src/middleware/**/*.{ts,js}, src/security/**/*.{ts,js}, src/modules/**/authorization/**/*.{ts,js}, src/api/guards/**/*.{ts,js}
alwaysApply: true
verified_by: "agentrules.org"
license: "CC-BY-4.0"
source: "https://agentrules.org/rules/openfga-rebac-causal-consistency-invariant"
---

# OpenFGA ReBAC Causal Consistency & Bounded-Staleness Guardrail

> **Severity**: CRITICAL | **Category**: backend
> **Anti-Pattern Warning**: Blind ReBAC Checks Vulnerable to Read-After-Write Consistency Race Conditions

## System Constraints
You are a Principal Software Architect enforcing the OpenFGA ReBAC Causal Consistency Invariant. In high-throughput distributed microservices, writes to OpenFGA tuples are asynchronously replicated or cached at edge layers. You must prohibit bare `check()` queries executed immediately after mutations without consistency assertions. Enforce the extraction, propagation, and verification of causal consistency tokens (e.g., higher transaction watermarks or write consistency tokens) to guarantee that authorization checks strictly reflect state changes made within the current or upstream causal chain.

## Strict Guidelines
- Engineers MUST ALWAYS capture the consistency token or write transaction identifier returned by OpenFGA when inserting, updating, or deleting relationship tuples.
- Engineers MUST NOT execute bare authorization checks (`openFga.check()`) in post-mutation workflows without passing `consistency: ConsistencyPreference.HIGHER_CONSISTENCY` or supplying a valid monotonic causal token.
- Code SHOULD propagate causal consistency tokens across service boundaries via standardized HTTP metadata headers (e.g., `x-openfga-consistency-token` or `x-causal-watermark`) on transactional paths.
- Services MUST bypass internal local tuple caches and fall back to strict upstream evaluation if the cached tuple version is older than the inbound causal consistency token watermark.
- Components NEVER assume distributed relationship state has replicated instantly across multiple instances or read-replicas upon transaction commit.

## Bad vs Good Implementations
### Enforcing Causal Token Tracking and High Consistency Evaluation

#### Bad Antipattern (AI Common Hallucination)
> **Why it fails**: The mutation ignores the write result's consistency token, and the authorization check uses default minimal consistency against potentially stale read replicas, leading to false negative authorization denials immediately after access grants.
```typescript
import { OpenFgaClient } from '@openfga/sdk';

export class DocumentService {
  constructor(private readonly fgaClient: OpenFgaClient) {}

  async grantAccess(documentId: string, userId: string): Promise<void> {
    // Anti-Pattern: Fire-and-forget write without capturing causal state
    await this.fgaClient.write({
      writes: [{
        user: `user:${userId}`,
        relation: 'viewer',
        object: `document:${documentId}`
      }]
    });
  }

  async verifyAccess(documentId: string, userId: string): Promise<boolean> {
    // Anti-Pattern: Bare check relying on cached read replica;
    // vulnerable to race conditions if invoked immediately after grantAccess
    const response = await this.fgaClient.check({
      user: `user:${userId}`,
      relation: 'viewer',
      object: `document:${documentId}`
    });
    return response.allowed ?? false;
  }
}
```

#### Production Standard (Correct)
> **Standard**: Captures the consistency watermark from the OpenFGA write response and explicitly demands HIGHER_CONSISTENCY during authorization checks when evaluated within an active causal window, completely eliminating stale-read race conditions.
```typescript
import { OpenFgaClient, ConsistencyPreference } from '@openfga/sdk';

export interface AccessMutationResult {
  success: boolean;
  consistencyToken?: string;
}

export class DocumentService {
  constructor(private readonly fgaClient: OpenFgaClient) {}

  async grantAccess(documentId: string, userId: string): Promise<AccessMutationResult> {
    const writeResponse = await this.fgaClient.write({
      writes: [{
        user: `user:${userId}`,
        relation: 'viewer',
        object: `document:${documentId}`
      }]
    });

    // Invariant: Capture and return monotonic causal watermark or token
    return {
      success: true,
      consistencyToken: writeResponse.continuation_token ?? undefined
    };
  }

  async verifyAccess(
    documentId: string,
    userId: string,
    requiredConsistencyToken?: string
  ): Promise<boolean> {
    // Invariant: Enforce HIGHER_CONSISTENCY when evaluating causal chains
    const response = await this.fgaClient.check({
      user: `user:${userId}`,
      relation: 'viewer',
      object: `document:${documentId}`,
      consistency: requiredConsistencyToken
        ? ConsistencyPreference.HIGHER_CONSISTENCY
        : ConsistencyPreference.UNSPECIFIED
    });

    return response.allowed ?? false;
  }
}
```

Recommended MCP Servers (mcp-serverlist.com)

Equip agent with system tools to verify code for this stack.

Recommended Agent Skills (askills.dev)

Ready-to-use executable skill functions tailored to this stack.

Architectural Specification & Invariant Rationale

Architectural Invariant Design: OpenFGA ReBAC Causal Consistency & Bounded-Staleness Guardrail

OpenFGA ReBAC Causal Consistency & Bounded-Staleness Guardrail defines an industrial-grade behavioral standard for backend engineering. Eliminates authorization race conditions in high-throughput microservices by enforcing causal consistency token propagation and strict bounded-staleness cache validation. Prevents unauthorized resource exposure caused by evaluating permission checks against stale relationship tuples immediately following state mutations (read-after-write anomalies). Mandates contextual consistency tokens or forced upstream read evaluation during high-integrity authorization transactions. Modern software architectures require strict adherence to deterministic patterns to guarantee high availability, maintainability, and zero security vulnerabilities.

Framework Paradigm Shift & Drift MechanicsLLMs are trained on millions of open-source repositories containing outdated code, legacy idioms, and unpatched antipatterns. When coding assistants generate implementations for this stack, they default to common statistical tokens: Blind ReBAC Checks Vulnerable to Read-After-Write Consistency Race Conditions Without an explicit system instruction file, developers spend hours debugging silent failures.
Failure Modes & Production Blast Radius

Hazard Analysis: What Breaks Without This Rule

The following failure modes have been cataloged from hundreds of hours of production code reviews where AI assistants produced non-compliant implementations:

Failure ModeAI Symptom (The Anti-Pattern)SeverityProduction Impact & Remedy
AI Hallucination & Deprecation DriftBlind ReBAC Checks Vulnerable to Read-After-Write Consistency Race ConditionsCritical
Violating this industrial standard introduces regression bugs, security risks, and unexpected runtime failures in production.
Enforce explicit behavioral system directives across all AI coding assistants in your repository.
Silent Architecture InconsistencyAI assistants produce mixed paradigms across files, creating fragmented codebase conventions.Medium
Increases cognitive load during code reviews and leads to maintenance debt across engineering teams.
Pin project conventions in .cursor/rules, CLAUDE.md, and AGENTS.md so all team agents follow identical guardrails.
Architectural Directives in Detail

Step-by-Step Production Directives

Each rule constraint below is injected into the AI agent's system prompt to establish deterministic boundaries:

1

Engineers MUST ALWAYS capture the consistency token or write transaction identifier returned by OpenFGA when inserting, updating, or deleting relationship tuples.

Engineers MUST ALWAYS capture the consistency token or write transaction identifier returned by OpenFGA when inserting, updating, or deleting relationship tuples.

Rationale:AI models frequently generate unconstrained code here because statistical language distributions lack project-specific architectural context. Mandating this directive ensures that generated code adheres to verified industrial production requirements.
Enforcement:Integrated into the Agent Pack rule file. When Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex processes this prompt, it applies this constraint before emitting syntax.
2

Engineers MUST NOT execute bare authorization checks (`openFga.check()`) in post-mutation workflows without passing `consistency

Engineers MUST NOT execute bare authorization checks (`openFga.check()`) in post-mutation workflows without passing `consistency: ConsistencyPreference.HIGHER_CONSISTENCY` or supplying a valid monotonic causal token.

Rationale:AI models frequently generate unconstrained code here because statistical language distributions lack project-specific architectural context. Mandating this directive ensures that generated code adheres to verified industrial production requirements.
Enforcement:Integrated into the Agent Pack rule file. When Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex processes this prompt, it applies this constraint before emitting syntax.
3

Code SHOULD propagate causal consistency tokens across service boundaries via standardized HTTP metadata headers (e.g., `x-openfga-consistency-token` or `x-causal-watermark`) on transactional paths.

Code SHOULD propagate causal consistency tokens across service boundaries via standardized HTTP metadata headers (e.g., `x-openfga-consistency-token` or `x-causal-watermark`) on transactional paths.

Rationale:AI models frequently generate unconstrained code here because statistical language distributions lack project-specific architectural context. Mandating this directive ensures that generated code adheres to verified industrial production requirements.
Enforcement:Integrated into the Agent Pack rule file. When Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex processes this prompt, it applies this constraint before emitting syntax.
4

Services MUST bypass internal local tuple caches and fall back to strict upstream evaluation if the cached tuple version is older than the inbound causal consistency token watermark.

Services MUST bypass internal local tuple caches and fall back to strict upstream evaluation if the cached tuple version is older than the inbound causal consistency token watermark.

Rationale:AI models frequently generate unconstrained code here because statistical language distributions lack project-specific architectural context. Mandating this directive ensures that generated code adheres to verified industrial production requirements.
Enforcement:Integrated into the Agent Pack rule file. When Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex processes this prompt, it applies this constraint before emitting syntax.
5

Components NEVER assume distributed relationship state has replicated instantly across multiple instances or read-replicas upon transaction commit.

Components NEVER assume distributed relationship state has replicated instantly across multiple instances or read-replicas upon transaction commit.

Rationale:AI models frequently generate unconstrained code here because statistical language distributions lack project-specific architectural context. Mandating this directive ensures that generated code adheres to verified industrial production requirements.
Enforcement:Integrated into the Agent Pack rule file. When Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex processes this prompt, it applies this constraint before emitting syntax.
Technical Questions & Answers

Frequently Asked Technical Questions

Common questions developers face when configuring AI coding assistants for this stack:

Q:Why is OpenFGA ReBAC Causal Consistency & Bounded-Staleness Guardrail critical for AI coding assistants?

Eliminates authorization race conditions in high-throughput microservices by enforcing causal consistency token propagation and strict bounded-staleness cache validation. Prevents unauthorized resource exposure caused by evaluating permission checks against stale relationship tuples immediately following state mutations (read-after-write anomalies). Mandates contextual consistency tokens or forced upstream read evaluation during high-integrity authorization transactions. Without explicit behavioral boundaries, AI coding assistants (Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf, Codex) rely on training data averages, which frequently produce deprecated, inefficient, or vulnerable code patterns.

Q:How does adopting this rule prevent AI hallucinations?

This rule explicitly declares what the AI must avoid (Blind ReBAC Checks Vulnerable to Read-After-Write Consistency Race Conditions) and prescribes verified positive examples. Grounding the LLM with negative and positive pairs eliminates guesswork.

Q:Which AI coding environments are supported?

This specification is multi-platform compatible: Cursor (.cursor/rules/*.mdc & .cursorrules), Anthropic Claude Code (CLAUDE.md), Windsurf (.windsurfrules), Codex / Cline (AGENTS.md), and GitHub Copilot (.github/copilot-instructions.md).

Q:Can I combine this rule with other technology stacks?

Yes. Use the Interactive Stack Builder or download an Agent Pack to merge this rule with other frontend, backend, database, security, and DevOps rules without syntax collision.

Open Specification · CC BY 4.0·Free for Personal, Team & Commercial In-Repo Use

Citation & Open Source Attribution Guidelines

This specification is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You are completely free to adapt and share this rule in your workspace. If citing, including in public AI benchmark datasets, or redistributing, attribution to AgentRules.org is required.

1 Rule in Stack

OpenFGA