This specification is maintained by the AgentRules Working Group. Have enhancements or want to claim maintainership?Submit Specification →
mobilecritical PriorityID: kmp-swift-asyncstream-cancellation-bridge

Kotlin Multiplatform 2.1 Swift AsyncStream Cancellation Bridge Standard

Enforces strict cooperative cancellation bridging between Kotlin Coroutines and Swift Concurrency via SKIE or explicit Job termination hooks in AsyncStream.onTermination handlers. Without this invariant, Swift Task aborts leave underlying Kotlin Job hierarchies running indefinitely, causing silent thread pool starvation and memory leaks across the Objective-C/Swift ABI bridge.

Prohibited Anti-Pattern: Orphaned Kotlin Coroutine Jobs Surviving Cancelled Swift AsyncStream Tasks

Export Ready-to-Drop Configuration

Select format below to copy code or download file directly.

---
description: Kotlin Multiplatform 2.1 Swift AsyncStream Cancellation Bridge Standard - Enforces strict cooperative cancellation bridging between Kotlin Coroutines and Swift Concurrency via SKIE or explicit Job termination hooks in AsyncStream.onTermination handlers. Without this invariant, Swift Task aborts leave underlying Kotlin Job hierarchies running indefinitely, causing silent thread pool starvation and memory leaks across the Objective-C/Swift ABI bridge.
globs: iosApp/**/*.swift, shared/src/iosMain/**/*.kt, shared/src/commonMain/**/*.kt, **/*Bridge*.swift, **/*Repository*.swift
alwaysApply: true
verified_by: "agentrules.org"
license: "CC-BY-4.0"
source: "https://agentrules.org/rules/kmp-swift-asyncstream-cancellation-bridge"
---

# Kotlin Multiplatform 2.1 Swift AsyncStream Cancellation Bridge Standard

> **Severity**: CRITICAL | **Category**: mobile
> **Anti-Pattern Warning**: Orphaned Kotlin Coroutine Jobs Surviving Cancelled Swift AsyncStream Tasks

## System Constraints
You are a Principal Mobile Architect enforcing the KMP 2.1 Swift AsyncStream Cancellation Bridge Standard. Mandate that every Swift AsyncStream bridging a Kotlin Coroutine Flow or Job explicitly registers an `onTermination` handler or leverages verified SKIE zero-cost bridge cancellation. Reject any unmanaged bridging where Swift Task abortion fails to cancel the underlying Kotlin `Job` / `DisposableHandle`.

## Strict Guidelines
- Engineers MUST ALWAYS register an `onTermination` closure when wrapping a Kotlin Flow or Suspend adapter inside a Swift `AsyncStream` or `AsyncThrowingStream`.
- Engineers MUST NOT discard or ignore the returned Kotlin `Cancellable` or `DisposableHandle` when starting collection on an iOS-exported Kotlin coroutine.
- Swift bridging code MUST invoke `job.cancel(cause: nil)` inside `continuation.onTermination = { _ in ... }` immediately upon stream completion or task cancellation.
- Kotlin-facing bridge protocols MUST return an explicit handle (e.g., `DisposableHandle` or `Job`) or consume a shared `CancellationHook` to allow the Swift foreign function interface (FFI) to trigger cooperative cancellation.
- Components NEVER assume Swift's `Task.isCancelled` automatically propagates across the Kotlin Native runtime boundary unless SKIE coroutine cancellation interop is explicitly configured and verified in `build.gradle.kts`.

## Bad vs Good Implementations
### Bridging Kotlin Flow to Swift AsyncStream with Lifecycle Management

#### Bad Antipattern (AI Common Hallucination)
> **Why it fails**: When the Swift Task wrapping observeUserSession() is cancelled (e.g., SwiftUI View unmounts via .task modifier), the continuation terminates but the underlying Kotlin Flow collector continues running indefinitely on a Kotlin dispatch thread, causing resource exhaustion.
```swift
// BAD: Kotlin Coroutine Job is discarded; Task cancellation leaves Kotlin Flow active in background
func observeUserSession() -> AsyncStream<UserSession> {
    AsyncStream { continuation in
        let watcher = sessionRepository.observeSession()
        watcher.watch { session in
            continuation.yield(session)
        }
        // Anti-pattern: No onTermination registered, watcher and Kotlin Job leak on Swift cancellation
    }
}
```

#### Production Standard (Correct)
> **Standard**: The returned DisposableHandle (representing the underlying Kotlin Job) is retained and explicitly cancelled within continuation.onTermination. When the Swift Task aborts, the signal immediately reaches the Kotlin Native runtime.
```swift
// GOOD: Cooperative cancellation bridged through DisposableHandle in onTermination
func observeUserSession() -> AsyncStream<UserSession> {
    AsyncStream { continuation in
        let cancellable = sessionRepository.observeSession().collectKotlinStream(
            onEach: { session in
                continuation.yield(session)
            },
            onCompletion: { error in
                continuation.finish()
            }
        )

        continuation.onTermination = { @Sendable _ in
            // Invariant: Swift cancellation terminates the Kotlin Job hierarchy immediately
            cancellable.dispose()
        }
    }
}
```

Recommended MCP Servers (mcp-serverlist.com)

Equip agent with system tools to verify code for this stack.

Recommended Agent Skills (askills.dev)

Ready-to-use executable skill functions tailored to this stack.

Architectural Specification & Invariant Rationale

Architectural Invariant Design: Kotlin Multiplatform 2.1 Swift AsyncStream Cancellation Bridge Standard

Kotlin Multiplatform 2.1 Swift AsyncStream Cancellation Bridge Standard defines an industrial-grade behavioral standard for mobile engineering. Enforces strict cooperative cancellation bridging between Kotlin Coroutines and Swift Concurrency via SKIE or explicit Job termination hooks in AsyncStream.onTermination handlers. Without this invariant, Swift Task aborts leave underlying Kotlin Job hierarchies running indefinitely, causing silent thread pool starvation and memory leaks across the Objective-C/Swift ABI bridge. Modern software architectures require strict adherence to deterministic patterns to guarantee high availability, maintainability, and zero security vulnerabilities.

Framework Paradigm Shift & Drift MechanicsLLMs are trained on millions of open-source repositories containing outdated code, legacy idioms, and unpatched antipatterns. When coding assistants generate implementations for this stack, they default to common statistical tokens: Orphaned Kotlin Coroutine Jobs Surviving Cancelled Swift AsyncStream Tasks Without an explicit system instruction file, developers spend hours debugging silent failures.
Failure Modes & Production Blast Radius

Hazard Analysis: What Breaks Without This Rule

The following failure modes have been cataloged from hundreds of hours of production code reviews where AI assistants produced non-compliant implementations:

Failure ModeAI Symptom (The Anti-Pattern)SeverityProduction Impact & Remedy
AI Hallucination & Deprecation DriftOrphaned Kotlin Coroutine Jobs Surviving Cancelled Swift AsyncStream TasksCritical
Violating this industrial standard introduces regression bugs, security risks, and unexpected runtime failures in production.
Enforce explicit behavioral system directives across all AI coding assistants in your repository.
Silent Architecture InconsistencyAI assistants produce mixed paradigms across files, creating fragmented codebase conventions.Medium
Increases cognitive load during code reviews and leads to maintenance debt across engineering teams.
Pin project conventions in .cursor/rules, CLAUDE.md, and AGENTS.md so all team agents follow identical guardrails.
Architectural Directives in Detail

Step-by-Step Production Directives

Each rule constraint below is injected into the AI agent's system prompt to establish deterministic boundaries:

1

Engineers MUST ALWAYS register an `onTermination` closure when wrapping a Kotlin Flow or Suspend adapter inside a Swift `AsyncStream` or `AsyncThrowingStream`.

Engineers MUST ALWAYS register an `onTermination` closure when wrapping a Kotlin Flow or Suspend adapter inside a Swift `AsyncStream` or `AsyncThrowingStream`.

Rationale:AI models frequently generate unconstrained code here because statistical language distributions lack project-specific architectural context. Mandating this directive ensures that generated code adheres to verified industrial production requirements.
Enforcement:Integrated into the Agent Pack rule file. When Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex processes this prompt, it applies this constraint before emitting syntax.
2

Engineers MUST NOT discard or ignore the returned Kotlin `Cancellable` or `DisposableHandle` when starting collection on an iOS-exported Kotlin coroutine.

Engineers MUST NOT discard or ignore the returned Kotlin `Cancellable` or `DisposableHandle` when starting collection on an iOS-exported Kotlin coroutine.

Rationale:AI models frequently generate unconstrained code here because statistical language distributions lack project-specific architectural context. Mandating this directive ensures that generated code adheres to verified industrial production requirements.
Enforcement:Integrated into the Agent Pack rule file. When Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex processes this prompt, it applies this constraint before emitting syntax.
3

Swift bridging code MUST invoke `job.cancel(cause

Swift bridging code MUST invoke `job.cancel(cause: nil)` inside `continuation.onTermination = { _ in ... }` immediately upon stream completion or task cancellation.

Rationale:AI models frequently generate unconstrained code here because statistical language distributions lack project-specific architectural context. Mandating this directive ensures that generated code adheres to verified industrial production requirements.
Enforcement:Integrated into the Agent Pack rule file. When Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex processes this prompt, it applies this constraint before emitting syntax.
4

Kotlin-facing bridge protocols MUST return an explicit handle (e.g., `DisposableHandle` or `Job`) or consume a shared `CancellationHook` to allow the Swift foreign function interface (FFI) to trigger cooperative cancellation.

Kotlin-facing bridge protocols MUST return an explicit handle (e.g., `DisposableHandle` or `Job`) or consume a shared `CancellationHook` to allow the Swift foreign function interface (FFI) to trigger cooperative cancellation.

Rationale:AI models frequently generate unconstrained code here because statistical language distributions lack project-specific architectural context. Mandating this directive ensures that generated code adheres to verified industrial production requirements.
Enforcement:Integrated into the Agent Pack rule file. When Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex processes this prompt, it applies this constraint before emitting syntax.
5

Components NEVER assume Swift's `Task.isCancelled` automatically propagates across the Kotlin Native runtime boundary unless SKIE coroutine cancellation interop is explicitly configured and verified in `build.gradle.kts`.

Components NEVER assume Swift's `Task.isCancelled` automatically propagates across the Kotlin Native runtime boundary unless SKIE coroutine cancellation interop is explicitly configured and verified in `build.gradle.kts`.

Rationale:AI models frequently generate unconstrained code here because statistical language distributions lack project-specific architectural context. Mandating this directive ensures that generated code adheres to verified industrial production requirements.
Enforcement:Integrated into the Agent Pack rule file. When Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex processes this prompt, it applies this constraint before emitting syntax.
Technical Questions & Answers

Frequently Asked Technical Questions

Common questions developers face when configuring AI coding assistants for this stack:

Q:Why is Kotlin Multiplatform 2.1 Swift AsyncStream Cancellation Bridge Standard critical for AI coding assistants?

Enforces strict cooperative cancellation bridging between Kotlin Coroutines and Swift Concurrency via SKIE or explicit Job termination hooks in AsyncStream.onTermination handlers. Without this invariant, Swift Task aborts leave underlying Kotlin Job hierarchies running indefinitely, causing silent thread pool starvation and memory leaks across the Objective-C/Swift ABI bridge. Without explicit behavioral boundaries, AI coding assistants (Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf, Codex) rely on training data averages, which frequently produce deprecated, inefficient, or vulnerable code patterns.

Q:How does adopting this rule prevent AI hallucinations?

This rule explicitly declares what the AI must avoid (Orphaned Kotlin Coroutine Jobs Surviving Cancelled Swift AsyncStream Tasks) and prescribes verified positive examples. Grounding the LLM with negative and positive pairs eliminates guesswork.

Q:Which AI coding environments are supported?

This specification is multi-platform compatible: Cursor (.cursor/rules/*.mdc & .cursorrules), Anthropic Claude Code (CLAUDE.md), Windsurf (.windsurfrules), Codex / Cline (AGENTS.md), and GitHub Copilot (.github/copilot-instructions.md).

Q:Can I combine this rule with other technology stacks?

Yes. Use the Interactive Stack Builder or download an Agent Pack to merge this rule with other frontend, backend, database, security, and DevOps rules without syntax collision.

Open Specification · CC BY 4.0·Free for Personal, Team & Commercial In-Repo Use

Citation & Open Source Attribution Guidelines

This specification is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You are completely free to adapt and share this rule in your workspace. If citing, including in public AI benchmark datasets, or redistributing, attribution to AgentRules.org is required.

Related MOBILE Rules

View all rules →
1 Rule in Stack

Kotlin