Architectural Invariant Design: KMP Retained State Lifecycle & Process Restoration Standard
KMP Retained State Lifecycle & Process Restoration Standard defines an industrial-grade behavioral standard for mobile engineering. Enforces deterministic lifecycle-bound cancellation and serialized state restoration across Kotlin Multiplatform targets. Prevents coroutine execution leaks during iOS UIViewController deallocation and state divergence against Android ViewModel process death restoration. Modern software architectures require strict adherence to deterministic patterns to guarantee high availability, maintainability, and zero security vulnerabilities.
Hazard Analysis: What Breaks Without This Rule
The following failure modes have been cataloged from hundreds of hours of production code reviews where AI assistants produced non-compliant implementations:
| Failure Mode | AI Symptom (The Anti-Pattern) | Severity | Production Impact & Remedy |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI Hallucination & Deprecation Drift | Unbounded CoroutineScope leaks on iOS dealloc combined with un-restored ephemeral state across Android process death. | Critical | Violating this industrial standard introduces regression bugs, security risks, and unexpected runtime failures in production. Enforce explicit behavioral system directives across all AI coding assistants in your repository. |
| Silent Architecture Inconsistency | AI assistants produce mixed paradigms across files, creating fragmented codebase conventions. | Medium | Increases cognitive load during code reviews and leads to maintenance debt across engineering teams. Pin project conventions in .cursor/rules, CLAUDE.md, and AGENTS.md so all team agents follow identical guardrails. |
Step-by-Step Production Directives
Each rule constraint below is injected into the AI agent's system prompt to establish deterministic boundaries:
Engineers MUST ALWAYS encapsulate KMP state holders within an explicit retained-instance boundary (such as Decompose InstanceKeeper or lifecycle-aware ViewModel wrapper) that binds CoroutineScope cancellation to host deallocation.
Engineers MUST ALWAYS encapsulate KMP state holders within an explicit retained-instance boundary (such as Decompose InstanceKeeper or lifecycle-aware ViewModel wrapper) that binds CoroutineScope cancellation to host deallocation.
Engineers MUST NOT bind platform-agnostic StateFlow producers to a global or unmanaged CoroutineScope (`GlobalScope` or unbounded platform singleton).
Engineers MUST NOT bind platform-agnostic StateFlow producers to a global or unmanaged CoroutineScope (`GlobalScope` or unbounded platform singleton).
Code SHOULD implement dual-layer state restoration
Code SHOULD implement dual-layer state restoration: in-memory retained instances for configuration changes, and Parcelable/Serializable state survival for low-memory OS process termination.
Services MUST expose explicit `close()` or `clear()` hooks invoked immediately when an iOS `UIViewController` executes `deinit` or detects `isMovingFromParent` / `isBeingDismissed`.
Services MUST expose explicit `close()` or `clear()` hooks invoked immediately when an iOS `UIViewController` executes `deinit` or detects `isMovingFromParent` / `isBeingDismissed`.
Components NEVER capture platform lifecycle instances (`UIViewController`, `Activity`, `Fragment`) inside common state holders or long-lived coroutine closures.
Components NEVER capture platform lifecycle instances (`UIViewController`, `Activity`, `Fragment`) inside common state holders or long-lived coroutine closures.
Frequently Asked Technical Questions
Common questions developers face when configuring AI coding assistants for this stack:
Q:Why is KMP Retained State Lifecycle & Process Restoration Standard critical for AI coding assistants?
Enforces deterministic lifecycle-bound cancellation and serialized state restoration across Kotlin Multiplatform targets. Prevents coroutine execution leaks during iOS UIViewController deallocation and state divergence against Android ViewModel process death restoration. Without explicit behavioral boundaries, AI coding assistants (Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf, Codex) rely on training data averages, which frequently produce deprecated, inefficient, or vulnerable code patterns.
Q:How does adopting this rule prevent AI hallucinations?
This rule explicitly declares what the AI must avoid (Unbounded CoroutineScope leaks on iOS dealloc combined with un-restored ephemeral state across Android process death.) and prescribes verified positive examples. Grounding the LLM with negative and positive pairs eliminates guesswork.
Q:Which AI coding environments are supported?
This specification is multi-platform compatible: Cursor (.cursor/rules/*.mdc & .cursorrules), Anthropic Claude Code (CLAUDE.md), Windsurf (.windsurfrules), Codex / Cline (AGENTS.md), and GitHub Copilot (.github/copilot-instructions.md).
Q:Can I combine this rule with other technology stacks?
Yes. Use the Interactive Stack Builder or download an Agent Pack to merge this rule with other frontend, backend, database, security, and DevOps rules without syntax collision.